
Boosting conversion rate with location targeting in Google Ads
12 May 2026
Ad copy relevance is critical to paid search performance, especially in competitive markets. But how do you maintain relevance when campaigns are split by geography? This is where location targeting in Google Ads can have a measurable impact, particularly when executed through tactics like location inserts.
What role do location inserts play?
Location inserts allow advertisers to dynamically tailor responsive search ad copy based on a user’s location, regular locations, or locations of interest. By aligning ad messaging with a searcher’s local context, brands can improve relevance, click-through rate, and ultimately conversion rate.The challenge of targeting at scale
The campaigns in one of our lead gen accounts are broken down by counties across the UK, and each of these has a high amount of competition. Using Greater Manchester as an example – this area has a lot of smaller towns, so using a headline such as ‘Manchester Windows’ isn’t specific enough. This is where location-based ad copy became a strategic opportunity. With location inserts, we were able to dynamically tailor messaging to the user’s specific town or area, whether that was Stockport, Salford, or Oldham. This approach supported a more precise local targeting strategy without the need to create hundreds of static ads.Before location inserts, searching from Oldham:

After location inserts, searching from Oldham:

Testing a location targeting strategy
Greater Manchester was used as the test location due to its high levels of traffic and the diverse number of areas which can be targeted. Location Inserts were tested for 43 days using 50/50 experiments on both the Exact Match Keyword & Broad Match Keyword campaigns. This might seem like a long period of time, but it meant we were able to drive a significant amount of data through the experiments in order to determine significant results.Results: the impact on performance
The overall results were very positive, as there was an uplift across key metrics. CPC-
- 18% lower on the Exact experiment
- 5% lower on the Broad experiment
-
- 29% higher on the Exact experiment
- 50% higher on the Broad experiment
-
- 5.1% higher on the Exact experiment
- 1.7% higher on the Broad experiment
-
- 36% higher on the Exact experiment
- 78% higher on the Broad experiment
-
- 40% reduction on the Exact experiment
- 47% reduction on the Broad experiment

